Instrumen Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Program Sekolah

Posted By admin On 25.09.19
Instrumen Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Program Sekolah Average ratng: 5,6/10 4168 reviews
  1. Makalah Monitoring Dan Evaluasi
  1. Tidak ada 10 Keterlibatan (peran dan fungsi) komite sekolah terhadap penyelenggaraan pendidikan terhadap tiga kegiatan, yaitu: Pembuatan RPS, pelaksanaan program dan evaluasi program: a. 3 kegiatan c. 1 kegiatan b.
  2. Melaksanakan monitoring dan evaluasi (Monev) dan audit internal terhadap penyelenggaraan PPG di lingkungan program studi dan penyelenggaraan pendidikan berasrama serta monevin pada sekolah mitra tempat penyelenggaraan PPL PPG. Pelaksanaan program PPG SM3T di UNP saat ini meliputi sepuluh prodi yaitu: (1).

Beberapa sasaran program yang telah dikembangkan sebelumnya. Asumsikan bahwa program-program sekolah untuk mencapai sasaran sudah selesai dilaksanakan. Susun instrumen yang dapat menilai keberhasilan program tersebut dalam mencapai sasaran dengan asumsi sekolah telah memiliki data monitoring dan data-data lain yang dibutuhkan.

Abstract: Strategies appropriate principals are highly demanded to make a change to improve the quality of schools. The purpose of this study to determine the program, program implementation, evaluation and barriers faced by principals to improve the quality of education at the Junior High School 2 Mesjid Raya of Aceh Besar district. The technique of collecting data through observation, interviews, and documentation. Research subjects principals, vice-principals, school committee, chairman MGMPs, teachers and supervisors. Data were analyzed by reducing, display, draw conclusions and verification of data. The results showed: (1) Programs are arranged not entirely based on the consensus reached school personnel. Quality improvement programs documented in the annual program and semester program to be used as a reference in implementing the program.

Evaluasi

(2) The implementation of the quality improvement program begins with the division of tasks with daily activities forming the executive committee of the school. Programs implemented not entirely based on a predetermined schedule. If the principal is absent, then the authority to implement the program submitted to the vice-principal or a senior teacher. (3) The evaluation was conducted by a committee or team that has been formed by the principal that includes principals, vice principals, supervisors and senior teachers. Prior to the evaluation carried out, the executive committee drafting and preparing instruments evaluation beforehand.

The evaluation results will be analyzed and used as a consideration in the decision making in determining the program the following year, and (4) barriers faced by principals are still lacking kediplinan teachers, most school personnel are less committed to the running quality improvement program, the principal less timely in implementing quality improvement programs, the majority of teachers are less serious when seniors do performance monitoring.

Dan

Abstract This study aimed to describe the design, installation, process and product implementation SDSN program at SDN 1 Ngadirejo Temanggung. This study is evaluative, by using a mixed methods Discrepancy models. The data collecting technique used interview, questionnaires, study documentation, and observation. The validity of the data was done by using triangulation.

The results of the study were (a) the design stage in accordance with the guidelines organizing school national standards, (b) the installation phase there was a shortage of space (c) phase of the process has not been implemented to the maximum, competency standards there was a gap in the medium category that has not been able to achieve in the level district or higher. Content standards had gaps with low category, the ownership of the curriculum document by 80%. Standard processes had gaps with low category that teachers rarely did ICT-based learning. Standard teachers and education personnel had gaps medium category that educators were still many of internship teachers(Guru Wiyata Bhakti). Standard facilities and infrastructure has a gap with category-less school grounds and space for PBM. Management standards had gaps lower categories, namely activities carried out 70-89% of new schools, school community involvement in decision making policy and school programs of up to 70-80%.

Standard finance was still a gap with the low category for schools to implement the program required additional costs of the public. Assessment standards had gaps with low category because of the level of student learning outcomes documentation was only implemented by 75-90%. (d) Product implementation of programs already met the standard mastery learning is at least 95% and 90% of graduates go on to a higher school. The standards have not been met is the UN values above the regional average and have achievements in regional, national and international. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan.

Windows • Computing of Easter Sunday dates for any given year, using Western, Orthodox or Julian algorithms; • A comprehensive test suite. >>> from dateutil.relativedelta import * >>> from dateutil.easter import * >>> from dateutil.rrule import * >>> from dateutil.parser import * >>> from datetime import * >>> now = parse ( 'Sat Oct 11 17:13:46 UTC 2003' ) >>> today = now. Date () >>> year = rrule ( YEARLY, dtstart = now, bymonth = 8, bymonthday = 13, byweekday = FR )[ 0 ]. Building and releasing When you get the source, it does not contain the internal zoneinfo database. Year >>> rdelta = relativedelta ( easter ( year ), today ) >>> print ( 'Today is:%s '% today ) Today is: 2003-10-11 >>> print ( 'Year with next Aug 13th on a Friday is:%s '% year ) Year with next Aug 13th on a Friday is: 2004 >>> print ( 'How far is the Easter of that year:%s '% rdelta ) How far is the Easter of that year: relativedelta(months=+6) >>> print ( 'And the Easter of that year is:%s '% ( today + rdelta )) And the Easter of that year is: 2004-04-11 Being exactly 6 months ahead was really a coincidence:).

Contoh instrumen evaluasi program pdf

Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Direktorat Pembinaan TK dan SD. Panduan Penyelenggaraan Sekolah Standar Nasional untuk Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Istrumen Kinerja Sekolah Monitoring dan Evaluasi SSN. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Studi Evaluasi Program Sekolah Standar Nasional (SSN) pada SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnalep/article/./33/33 diakses pada 20 Mei 2014. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 tahun 2005 Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Tayibnapis, Farida Y. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Makalah Monitoring Dan Evaluasi

Evaluasi Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada. Proses lmplementasi Kebijakan Sekolah Standar Nasional pada Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Purbalingga. Purbalingga: UNSOED.